<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Love it When You Win. Just Not Too Much.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mikemywords.com/2010/01/21/we-love-it-when-you-win-just-not-too-much/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mikemywords.com/2010/01/21/we-love-it-when-you-win-just-not-too-much/</link>
	<description>From the Brain of Mike McDowell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 16:08:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Jerz</title>
		<link>http://mikemywords.com/2010/01/21/we-love-it-when-you-win-just-not-too-much/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Jerz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikemywords.com/?p=345#comment-315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you&#039;re right to a degree. You still have to factor in fandom in sports. For instance, the Yankees&#039; fans (and them being the number one team in the number one US market means there are an awful lot of them) won&#039;t ever desert them if they win ten straight. They&#039;ll just become the most insufferable bunch that an individual can come across. Your bell curve would then be really out of whack with a giant blip at one end. Same goes for the Cubs in the other direction. Another number one team in the number two market that hasn&#039;t won since, like 1532.

Overall I think you&#039;ve hit on something in that it may average out over time, except that with sports the amount of teams is too small to be dead correct. Sample sizes aren&#039;t big enough to get the best bell curve.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re right to a degree. You still have to factor in fandom in sports. For instance, the Yankees&#8217; fans (and them being the number one team in the number one US market means there are an awful lot of them) won&#8217;t ever desert them if they win ten straight. They&#8217;ll just become the most insufferable bunch that an individual can come across. Your bell curve would then be really out of whack with a giant blip at one end. Same goes for the Cubs in the other direction. Another number one team in the number two market that hasn&#8217;t won since, like 1532.</p>
<p>Overall I think you&#8217;ve hit on something in that it may average out over time, except that with sports the amount of teams is too small to be dead correct. Sample sizes aren&#8217;t big enough to get the best bell curve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

