<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RSCVA Reveals Their Branding Campaign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mikemywords.com/2009/09/25/rscva-reveals-their-branding-campaign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mikemywords.com/2009/09/25/rscva-reveals-their-branding-campaign/</link>
	<description>From the Brain of Mike McDowell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:30:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike McDowell</title>
		<link>http://mikemywords.com/2009/09/25/rscva-reveals-their-branding-campaign/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike McDowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 16:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikemywords.com/?p=315#comment-249</guid>
		<description>Thanks for adding that information to this post. Needed, for sure. Spokespeople (er, spokesanimals) can be a risk, for sure. You&#039;re right, it does seem to be slightly off the theme of the campaign, unless it turns out to be a very quirky sheep. The Geico and AFLAC case studies are interesting because they were used as memory triggers to help remember an obscure business name (and, as you point out, decided on using a large TV budget to spread awareness). I can&#039;t recall if I&#039;ve seen a spokesanimal/character for destination marketing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for adding that information to this post. Needed, for sure. Spokespeople (er, spokesanimals) can be a risk, for sure. You&#8217;re right, it does seem to be slightly off the theme of the campaign, unless it turns out to be a very quirky sheep. The Geico and AFLAC case studies are interesting because they were used as memory triggers to help remember an obscure business name (and, as you point out, decided on using a large TV budget to spread awareness). I can&#8217;t recall if I&#8217;ve seen a spokesanimal/character for destination marketing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry DeVincenzi</title>
		<link>http://mikemywords.com/2009/09/25/rscva-reveals-their-branding-campaign/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry DeVincenzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikemywords.com/?p=315#comment-236</guid>
		<description>Regarding the Big Horn sheep spokesperson....

The introduction to this element included asking the crowd in attendance who recognized Geico&#039;s gecko and AFLAC&#039;s duck.  Mortar&#039;s spokesperson is a very charming man with a heavy British accent - so there was some good humor in how it was positioned (although he kept saying Nevahdah).  I could care less how you pronounce our state - but others might have bristled a bit that he wasn&#039;t &quot;correct&quot;, which certainly positioned him as the &quot;out-of-town&quot; expert.

But then he polled the crowd - &quot;how many of you know what AFLAC does&quot;?  Very few would admit (in that setting) that they did.  Maybe three or four out of 50 people.

Certainly these brand characters were recognizable - there have been millions spent maintaining their visibility.  But the informal poll of the audience  clearly illustrated that few knew what AFLAC&#039;s core business was (which was surprising to me).  I think Mortar intended to support the fact that they were highly recognized brands with cultural icons.

This somewhat confusing set-up and informal audience poll served as a sequay to introduce the Big Horn sheep as the region&#039;s new &quot;spokesperson&quot;.  But the example used was that while they were recognizable, they didn&#039;t communicate the brand&#039;s basic values or scope of business.

It was contradictory - to say the least.

I&#039;m not entirely &quot;sold&quot; on the Big Horn sheep, per se.  But I understand why they&#039;d want to engage a character of sorts to help communicate the unique values of our community, and utilize it to geographically identify the specific locations to those unique opportunities.

The tactic of doing that for this crowd was all wrong (in my opinion).  It confused more than clarified.  And there were some passionate naysayers, like our Mayor, laying in wait in the audience for just such an opportunity to show off. That certainly didn&#039;t help convince anyone that the very contemporary art direction suggested was supported by clear brand strategy.   This simple element may have been another reason there was such an irrational reaction to something as simple as the proposed tag line.  

Once you have community leaders wagging fingers at good people over a total misunderstanding of the rationale - then the media swoops in to grab the sensational headline, rather than reporting the facts.  PR fail.

You know how it goes... better than most, Mike.  Sometimes it&#039;s not the core value of the concept that is rejected, it&#039;s the way you present it to the client.  Mortar and the RSCVA have done a great job on this campaign - they just missed the mark a bit in its presentation to the public (and key community stakeholders) - in front of media.  I don&#039;t think that helped gain the public acceptance needed for this very smart, bold, needed repositioning campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the Big Horn sheep spokesperson&#8230;.</p>
<p>The introduction to this element included asking the crowd in attendance who recognized Geico&#8217;s gecko and AFLAC&#8217;s duck.  Mortar&#8217;s spokesperson is a very charming man with a heavy British accent &#8211; so there was some good humor in how it was positioned (although he kept saying Nevahdah).  I could care less how you pronounce our state &#8211; but others might have bristled a bit that he wasn&#8217;t &#8220;correct&#8221;, which certainly positioned him as the &#8220;out-of-town&#8221; expert.</p>
<p>But then he polled the crowd &#8211; &#8220;how many of you know what AFLAC does&#8221;?  Very few would admit (in that setting) that they did.  Maybe three or four out of 50 people.</p>
<p>Certainly these brand characters were recognizable &#8211; there have been millions spent maintaining their visibility.  But the informal poll of the audience  clearly illustrated that few knew what AFLAC&#8217;s core business was (which was surprising to me).  I think Mortar intended to support the fact that they were highly recognized brands with cultural icons.</p>
<p>This somewhat confusing set-up and informal audience poll served as a sequay to introduce the Big Horn sheep as the region&#8217;s new &#8220;spokesperson&#8221;.  But the example used was that while they were recognizable, they didn&#8217;t communicate the brand&#8217;s basic values or scope of business.</p>
<p>It was contradictory &#8211; to say the least.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not entirely &#8220;sold&#8221; on the Big Horn sheep, per se.  But I understand why they&#8217;d want to engage a character of sorts to help communicate the unique values of our community, and utilize it to geographically identify the specific locations to those unique opportunities.</p>
<p>The tactic of doing that for this crowd was all wrong (in my opinion).  It confused more than clarified.  And there were some passionate naysayers, like our Mayor, laying in wait in the audience for just such an opportunity to show off. That certainly didn&#8217;t help convince anyone that the very contemporary art direction suggested was supported by clear brand strategy.   This simple element may have been another reason there was such an irrational reaction to something as simple as the proposed tag line.  </p>
<p>Once you have community leaders wagging fingers at good people over a total misunderstanding of the rationale &#8211; then the media swoops in to grab the sensational headline, rather than reporting the facts.  PR fail.</p>
<p>You know how it goes&#8230; better than most, Mike.  Sometimes it&#8217;s not the core value of the concept that is rejected, it&#8217;s the way you present it to the client.  Mortar and the RSCVA have done a great job on this campaign &#8211; they just missed the mark a bit in its presentation to the public (and key community stakeholders) &#8211; in front of media.  I don&#8217;t think that helped gain the public acceptance needed for this very smart, bold, needed repositioning campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike McDowell</title>
		<link>http://mikemywords.com/2009/09/25/rscva-reveals-their-branding-campaign/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike McDowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikemywords.com/?p=315#comment-235</guid>
		<description>Jim - I don&#039;t know how anybody involved in marketing can not be interested in this process. It&#039;s extremely interesting - not only the research that is revealing some truths about the area we live in, but the way in which the RSCVA is rolling it out and the campaign&#039;s reception. Even though the campaign is distinctively targeted at these two markets, there is a level of buy-in from locals that has to happen, as well. When you are marketing a community, it&#039;s always fascinating to see how that community accepts its brand position.

Larry - I think ultimately the brand positioning could serve as a tag line - you&#039;re right. &quot;A little west of center&quot; may have been a bit too obtuse for people, and made them feel more like they were saying the region was more on the &quot;weird&quot; side than the &quot;quirky&quot; side (which, in turn, made people feel like we were telling them that they were weird). There&#039;s a fine balance to being quirky and being weird or awkward. 

I&#039;ll be interested to see more execution of the bighorn sheep spokesperson, too. I didn&#039;t include anything in this post about it because I didn&#039;t have a good example to reference. Did anyone offer up the artwork to use as a sample, or did anyone grab a good photo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim &#8211; I don&#8217;t know how anybody involved in marketing can not be interested in this process. It&#8217;s extremely interesting &#8211; not only the research that is revealing some truths about the area we live in, but the way in which the RSCVA is rolling it out and the campaign&#8217;s reception. Even though the campaign is distinctively targeted at these two markets, there is a level of buy-in from locals that has to happen, as well. When you are marketing a community, it&#8217;s always fascinating to see how that community accepts its brand position.</p>
<p>Larry &#8211; I think ultimately the brand positioning could serve as a tag line &#8211; you&#8217;re right. &#8220;A little west of center&#8221; may have been a bit too obtuse for people, and made them feel more like they were saying the region was more on the &#8220;weird&#8221; side than the &#8220;quirky&#8221; side (which, in turn, made people feel like we were telling them that they were weird). There&#8217;s a fine balance to being quirky and being weird or awkward. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be interested to see more execution of the bighorn sheep spokesperson, too. I didn&#8217;t include anything in this post about it because I didn&#8217;t have a good example to reference. Did anyone offer up the artwork to use as a sample, or did anyone grab a good photo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry DeVincenzi</title>
		<link>http://mikemywords.com/2009/09/25/rscva-reveals-their-branding-campaign/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry DeVincenzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikemywords.com/?p=315#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Great post Mike - as expected.  You&#039;ve managed to capture the historical aspects of recent meetings in an non-hysterical way.  We need to keep our heads while we debate these important issues that will affect us all.

My question is...if the &quot;A Little West Of Center&quot; tag line is not acceptable, why not simply run with the foundation of the campaign itself - &quot;Refreshingly Offbeat&quot;?

Seems that captures the essence of the campaign without being too creatively challenging.  I&#039;m sure the good minds at Mortar will work quickly now to tag this campaign and get it rolling forward.

I have some concerns about using a big horn sheep as our spokesperson - but given the executions I saw yesterday, I think it can resonate and work.

Great post...keep &#039;em coming!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Mike &#8211; as expected.  You&#8217;ve managed to capture the historical aspects of recent meetings in an non-hysterical way.  We need to keep our heads while we debate these important issues that will affect us all.</p>
<p>My question is&#8230;if the &#8220;A Little West Of Center&#8221; tag line is not acceptable, why not simply run with the foundation of the campaign itself &#8211; &#8220;Refreshingly Offbeat&#8221;?</p>
<p>Seems that captures the essence of the campaign without being too creatively challenging.  I&#8217;m sure the good minds at Mortar will work quickly now to tag this campaign and get it rolling forward.</p>
<p>I have some concerns about using a big horn sheep as our spokesperson &#8211; but given the executions I saw yesterday, I think it can resonate and work.</p>
<p>Great post&#8230;keep &#8216;em coming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim_S</title>
		<link>http://mikemywords.com/2009/09/25/rscva-reveals-their-branding-campaign/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim_S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikemywords.com/?p=315#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Thanks Mike. And thanks for taking an interest in the RSCVA&#039;s process. Part of the challenge is getting buy-in from those who understand how much research went into this work, so it helps to have ambassadors out there.

People interested in the branding process the RSCVA has undertaken can also get background and updates at update.visitrenotahoe.com.

Jim Scripps</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mike. And thanks for taking an interest in the RSCVA&#8217;s process. Part of the challenge is getting buy-in from those who understand how much research went into this work, so it helps to have ambassadors out there.</p>
<p>People interested in the branding process the RSCVA has undertaken can also get background and updates at update.visitrenotahoe.com.</p>
<p>Jim Scripps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
